Court: Discrimination against gay workers not prohibited…

With Trump Rolling Back Transgender Rights, What Should Employers Know?
March 1, 2017
2016 Scholarship Recipients: Member Spotlight (April 2017)
April 1, 2017

Court: Discrimination against gay workers not prohibited…

Last year, we updated with an opinion by the  U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in the case of EEOC v. Catastrophe Management Solutions, which upheld a decision by the district court that dismissed the complaint of a black job applicant that refused to cut her dreadlocks. The company rescinded her offer of employment pursuant to its “race neutral” grooming policy.

Well, now, the same court has recently ruled that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not prohibit discriminating against employees because of their sexual orientation. The case is Jameka Evans v. Georgia Regional Hospital, et al., and similar to the opinion in Catastrophe Management Solutions, the court noted that Congress sets policy, and would have to designate sexual orientation as a protected class. Unlike the aforementioned case, the Court further remanded the matter to the lower court, with instructions that the Plaintiff be allowed to amend her complaint to address the claim that she was discriminated against because of gender-based behavior (as sex discrimination is prohibited conduct). We’ll keep an eye on this matter and update accordingly. DEE


Damon Elmore



We’d love to hear from YOU! If you have any questions or suggestions, feel free to contact Damon directly at (404)518-5759 or


DISCLAIMER: The information provided in this feature is provided for informational purposes only.  No part of any information contained herein should be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient’s state.  The content of this Website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, opinions, decisions, verdicts or settlements.  NAAAHR, and NAAAHR Atlanta expressly disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this Website.

Leave a Reply